Wednesday, November 19, 2008

I'm Having A Hard Time Trusting This Guy's Logic...

"Dear Taxpayers,

Since the government-approved $700 billion bailout of institutions like the one that employs me as CEO, there has been a debate about whether such institutions can be trusted to use this capital in a responsible way.  More specifically, some members of Congress are calling for an investigation into what portion of that $700 billion will go to pay executive bonuses.  I understand your concern.  It was your money, after all. 

I can see how paying large bonuses at this time of financial crisis may be construed by some as irresponsible.  These same executives did oversee our economy’s plunge into the abyss, so why should ordinary, tax-paying Americans be forced to provide their safety net?  And how is it in the taxpayers’ interest to provide a multi-million dollar bonus to someone who is already well-situated in life while that taxpayer may be struggling to make ends meet?  Where is the return on that investment?  On the surface the idea of giving away billions of dollars to irresponsible executives, who’s greed led to the calculated plundering of the American - and world - economy, for a job atrociously done seems almost, well, ludicrous.  But every coin has two sides and, in this case, I ask you to consider the other.

By investing a large portion of the government bailout in executive bonuses we are, in turn, investing in the infrastructure of the American economy.  Suppose you are CEO of a major financial institution like me and you’ve just been given a multi-million dollar check for your loyal service over the last year.  Now, what will you do with that money?  You’ll buy Manhattan real estate, that’s what.  So now you own a very nice 3BR, 3 1/2 Bath condo in TriBeCa with a private terrace and brand new Viking range and you’ve paid top dollar for it.  The surrounding property values will rise as a result of your purchase and attract new buyers to the neighborhood.  The mortgages issued to pay for these condos will help support needy banks and the stores in the neighborhood will have a new customer base.  Maybe one of those stores does so well that the owners open a second location uptown or in Boston?  I suppose they’ll need to hire a staff to run the place, don’t you?  Job creation.  And maybe one of those employees in that store in Boston eventually saves up enough money to make a small investment.  What then?  Then he can come talk to my friends and I, the ones whose selfless actions led directly to his prosperous position.

So you see, spending a large - very large, in fact - portion of the government bailout on executive bonuses is a practical, patriotic plan for our economy.  By doing so, we will directly stimulate the real estate and luxury goods markets while creating jobs, thus stimulating the economy at large. I can’t explain it any better than that.  If you still cannot fathom how this could be good for you, the taxpayer, you will just have to trust our decisions.  After all, we are the experts. 

Sincerely,

The CEO of a major financial institution"

(via Streeter)

Comments

CEO Bonus

This is ridiculous logic. To paraphrase, if we give an executive a bonus, he will buy a new house and fancy stuff; this will, in turn, raise property value and increase the number of mortgages in the town. This will also increase business in the area, so much so that they will expand.

This pay-it-forward type of logic by an executive is stupid. The effects of bonuses of 100 executives would not postively impact the economy to any large degree. Sure there may be 50 new homes bought, but that isn't going to sure up any banks. And just because you buy some special coffee, sandwich or shirts, that isn't going to expand a company to a location hundreds of miles away.

It's sad that this guy is in a position that he needs to try to reason for this. He probably lost a good deal in the past couple of months and is trying to recoup his own money.

"Egotism is the anesthetic

"Egotism is the anesthetic that dulls the pain of stupidity" - Frank Leahy

That's the same logic...

...that I'm sure he applies to his misuse of bailout funds as he merges and acquires and does things other than provide credit liquidity.

"I'll just go out and buy this bank and the value of all the other banks will rise and then that creates jobs, right? Well, except for those that I have to lay off because we have redundant positions now, but that's not going to be all that big a deal. I'll just buy another bank and they can go work there!

"Or they can start their own businesses, if they can find credit, of course. But they won't be out in the rain for long! No, sireee!"

..

The fact that he actually tried to argue for this just goes to show what kind of giant, gaping assholes populate the banking industry. Not only does he - and all other banking executives - NOT deserve a bonus, they should be given a swift kick in the nuts.

This Ceo is on drugs

Dude needs to put down the crack pipe.

ceo?

what ceo of what company could this be? OMG!
trying to pass this for trickle down "bonus" economy?
I am laughing to not cry!
mamma mia!

Clearly this is a joke.

Clearly this is a joke. Idiots.

Wow this is obviously a

Wow this is obviously a joke. Idiots.

if you honestly took this

if you honestly took this letter as truth, then you are just about as gullible as the legislators that gave the banks their bailout.

That is the logic used from

That is the logic used from somebody who himself took the company he is CEO for straight to the shit tank. What a idot!

Teh fact some people do not

Teh fact some people do not see the comedy makes me more worried about our future

The definition of Sarcasm...

Please look it up.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Post new comment